- I use a dedicated stacking tool for the Mac called Starry Landscape Stacker (though I have not tried it, I have heard good things about Deep Sky Stacker for PC users – or you could install a virtual Mac on your PC, I do reverse to run PC programs on my Mac). I have been very impressed with both the relative ease of use and the final results.
- Sequator is a popular free option for Windows, and Starry Landscape Stacker is a popular $40 option for Mac (I couldn’t find a free competitor unfortunately). You can use Photoshop for image stacking, and you can find some tutorials/actions online if you’re interested. But dedicated software tends to do a better job in the more tricky.
20 images of Joshua trees stacked with Sequator
For quite some time astrophotographers have used a program called Deep Sky Stacker to align and combine multiple starry images and create a better result. Landscapes present a particular challenge, aligning the stars as they move through the sky would blur the landscape portion of the image. So programs have been created to stack the starry sky while masking and preserving the static landscape.
On a Mac, there’s Starry Landscape Stacker. On a PC, there’s Sequator. I recently built a fast Windows PC, so I downloaded Sequator to see how it performed. We capture star trails sequences of the Methodist Church on most of our workshops in Bodie, so that was a natural subject to start with.
Starry Landscape Stacker is a popular, Mac only, program that allows you to stack landscape images that include a starry night sky to reduce noise and enhance detail. It has been my personal choice of stacking software for some time now. This, however, is stacking for starry night skies, including the Milky Way. The idea here is to take several photos, one right after another, to reduce digital noise that generally occurs when pushing the camera’s sensitivity higher and higher. Then we throw the images into an app such as Starry Landscape Stacker (Mac) or Sequator (PC).
Next I had to try something a little more interesting, like a Milky Way reflection. I noticed that the program has an HDR setting, so I pointed it at three bracketed Milky Way shots taken one stop apart in exposure.
It turned out really well for a first pass. I had to process the reflection and the sky separately, since the stars move in different ways in each, then merge the results.
Then I tried stacking 20 files from a single-exposure star trails or time-lapse sequence, shot later that night at a different focal length:
Not all of my star reflection shots worked. My sense is that you need enough stars to make the alignment work, and the physics is such that you don’t always get enough reflected stars to pull that off.
Starry Landscape Stacker Alternative Mac
Obviously I’ll gain experience and be able to fine tune the process and results, but the initial results are very encouraging. Some of these were time-lapse or star trails sequences that I re-processed to produce a single image result for the first time. Others were two or three adjacent shots. How many images are needed at a minimum? How many optimum? Are different exposures needed for the foreground landscape? How many and at what settings? Should we shoot an HDR bracket, a sequence of images, or both: multiple HDR brackets?
The goal will be to get better results without too much impact on valuable night shooting time. I already have some ideas on how we might adjust our nighttime shooting practices, especially for those precious hours we have when we get permits to shoot at night in Bodie.
Since I originally wrote this post we’ve had a few night photography workshops in Bodie (see link above for info). That has given us the opportunity to test and develop lighting methods. We’ll be adapting our shooting and post-processing approach to still allow single image results while also accommodating a new workflow for people who want better, lower noise results.
I’m also trying faster lenses and various sensors, the Nikkor 20mm f/1.8 on the Nikon D850, Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 on the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, and so on. I’m looking forward to bringing more photographers out there this summer (schedule). We also shoot the High Sierra in Yosemite along Tioga Pass Road:
We will also test various techniques for desert locations that often involve more heat and sensor noise during Milky Way season, such as the California desert and high desert locations in Nevada:
Starry Landscape Stacker Mac Free Trial
Starry Landscape Stacker Mac How To Use
Starry Landscape Stacker For Mac
Our newest edits are looking best, so we’re gradually learning what we can pull off with the new workflow, from image capture to post-processing. We’re incorporating this into our shooting and post-processing flow for our workshops. We also hope to add Zoom calls soon to demonstrate and discuss what we’ve learned. Contact us to receive details when we’re ready to launch.
To help reduce noise in high ISO shots, stacking is becoming a popular option for astro-photographers. First, you must take a number of shots back-to-back with as little delay between them as possible. This means you won’t want any kind of 2-second delay or long exposure noise reduction turned on. Second, you’ll take anywhere from 4-20 shots. We recommend staying in the 8-12 shot range for best results and ease of use. When you get home, you’ll do some minor pre-processing of the RAW files and save them as uncompressed TIFF images. Next, you’ll load them into a software program that will align them and stack them using median averaging. For PC Users, we recommend using Sequator (click HERE for that procedure). For Mac Users, we recommend the program called Starry Landscape Stacker. You can view the PDF below for our Starry Landscape Stacker Procedure where we walk you through our best practices.